Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: February 2010

(As a note here, I’m not condoning the art of pornography or any of the factors involved in it – this is more of a discussion about society’s view of sex compared to other things)

If you want to believe everything that Apple says, then boobs are bad.  So bad, in fact, that Apple’s attempting to censor them entirely by deleting all the applications in their app store that contain nudity (With the exception of Playboy and Sports Illustrated, of course).  Their reason behind it?  “It came to the point where we were getting customer complaints from women who found the content getting too degrading and objectionable, as well as parents who were upset with what their kids were able to see.” Now, I could pull out the standard “Parenting actually requires the parents to pay attention” route on this topic much like I do when parents start whining about violent video games, but instead I want to cover a couple of other points that I feel mentioning.

First of all, censorship is never a good thing because it can never fully be done.  People who are looking for this kind of stuff will have other ways of getting it, whether it’s through websites or even through real media.  Censoring this kind of stuff doesn’t solve the problem, it just pushes the problem more underground and creates problems there.  And plus, what’s next – are you going to create filters so your web browser can’t browse sites with nudity?  Or start screening all incoming emails for links or pictures?  People will get it no matter what – that’s sadly the fun of the internet.

But more importantly (And this is society in general, not just Apple), of all the things to censor nudity seems like the worst of the big illegal three (Sex, violence, and drugs) to focus on.  I’ve always found it ridiculously hypocritical of society to make such a strong case against nudity, yet violent video games have such a low age requirement to buy.  To quote George Carlin, “People much wiser than I have said, I’d rather have my son watch a film with two people making love than two people trying to kill one other.”  He’s got it bang on – whether these uptight conservative people like it or not, nudity and sex is a natural event in life.  Drugs and violence?  Not at all.  So why aren’t we targeting those at all?  Why doesn’t Apple (And other companies) start banning violence in video games?

I like to think of myself as a fairly open-minded and good-natured person, and anything that I don’t want to see on the internet, or even in real life, I’ll intentionally avoid it.  But that’s my choice to avoid it – not my friend’s, not my relative’s, and most certainly not Apple’s.

As days go by, and especially after the release of the iPad as a glimse into Apple’s current and future mobile device strategy, I’m finding myself wanting a good competitor to the iPhone.  Yes, it’s mildly hypocritical of me considering I was wanting an iPhone a couple of months ago, butthe closed environment Apple is creating is no longer appealing to me.  And as for Android, while it looks intersting, it seems like most of the phone they’re shipping are lacking multitouch, and phones that support the software just don’t seem that appealing (With the exception of a few HTC phones)

But really, I’d love to see Microsoft do something to create a real competitor in the smartphone market.  Yes, their track record has not been good since the iPhone was released, but my hope is that Windows Mobile 7, expected to be previewed next Monday, will at the very least bring the OS up to the same kind of level that Apple currently has. They’ve had a very open platform that’s allowed apps to be made from anyone, distributed anywhere, and they have a lot of good technologies they can tie in with – Zune being the obvious one.  But no!  Rumours were released a few days ago, and all the signs are pointing to an almost blatent cloning of Apple’s strategy.  Limiting apps to a centralized marketplace, lack of multitasking, and no flash support?  Come on guys, you can do better than that.

Microsoft is apparently taking the “If Apple’s selling umpteen million phones using this strategy, then duplicating it will result in profit” strategy, but I’m not necessarily convinced that it’s the best method to take.  I’ve always been under the impression that people who go Android and WM are the people who want a change from the restricted Apple ecosystem.  That’s not to say everything Apple is doing is bad, but there are people who will look for bacwards compatibility on apps, and especially will be looking for multitasking and flash support.  Yes, what was posted is only a list of rumors, but I’m really hoping that they’re a little off base.  That said, there are some really interesting things on the list including a Zune-like interface, syncing through the Zune software, XBOX Live interation as well as social media, but those alone aren’t going to be the saving grace for the OS.

Monday the Mobile World Congress starts, and Microsoft is holding a keynote that day where they are expected to release details on the new OS, and I’ll be watching the liveblogs of the event hoping for something different.  Otherwise, Android will just look better and better.